StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
3683.T$1059.00-1.21%
Fair $1059.00+0.0%

3683.T

Cyberlinks Co., Ltd.

Technology / Software - InfrastructureTokyo

$1059.00

-13.00 (-1.21%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1059.00Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 51/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-56.0M · quality 40.3/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 14/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

51/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 3683.TLocal privado en este navegador · Cyberlinks Co., Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$11.8B

P/E

9.2x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.3x

↓

ROE

14.3%

↑

Gross Margin

32.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.39

↑
52-Week Range$1059
$940$2064

TradingView lightweight chart

3683.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,059Periodo +14.5%
Fair value: $1,059

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+14.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

2.2%

FCF / Net income

0.31x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $18.14B · net income $1.30B · FCF $399.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

32.5%-0.2% pts

Operating margin

10.2%+1.0% pts

Net margin

7.2%-0.3% pts

FCF margin

2.2%+4.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$18.14B$18.14B$15.87B$15.02B$12.22B
Net Income$1.30B$1.30B$814.0M$445.0M$909.0M
EBITDA$3.09B$3.09B$2.25B$1.65B$1.76B
EPS——72.1639.5086.08
Gross Margin32.5%32.5%30.9%31.8%32.7%
Operating Margin10.2%10.2%7.9%6.9%9.2%
Net Margin7.2%7.2%5.1%3.0%7.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.390.390.350.400.44
Current Ratio2.662.66———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$399.0M$399.0M$-72.0M$-56.0M$-271.0M
Returns
ROE14.3%14.3%10.0%6.0%12.8%
Valuation
P/E9.219.2110.8219.2711.05
EV/EBITDA4.264.264.515.836.20
P/B1.281.281.081.151.41
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth14.3%14.3%5.6%22.9%—
EPS Growth——82.7%-54.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -13.0%

Total return

-13.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

72.16 → n/d

Residual

-13.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-13.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.