StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
4018.SR$121.30-0.98%
Fair $121.30+0.0%

4018.SR

Almoosa Health Company

Healthcare / Medical Care FacilitiesSaudi

$121.30

-1.20 (-0.98%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $121.30Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 32/D
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-215.1M · quality 56.3/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 35/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

32/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 0unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 4018.SRLocal privado en este navegador · Almoosa Health Company
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$5.4B

P/E

28.1x

↑

EV/EBITDA

17.0x

↑

ROE

12.3%

↑

Gross Margin

31.7%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.42

↑
52-Week Range$121
$110$212

TradingView lightweight chart

4018.SR price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $121.30Periodo -13.6%
Fair value: $121.30

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-24.7%

FCF / Net income

-1.48x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.42B · net income $236.5M · FCF $-350.2M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

31.7%— pts

Operating margin

14.5%— pts

Net margin

16.7%— pts

FCF margin

-24.7%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$1.42B$1.42B$1.20B—
Net Income$236.5M$236.5M$49.4M—
EBITDA$361.0M$361.0M$226.4M—
EPS5.365.361.11—
Gross Margin31.7%31.7%30.9%—
Operating Margin14.5%14.5%14.2%—
Net Margin16.7%16.7%4.1%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.420.422.162.00
Current Ratio1.711.71——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-350.2M$-350.2M$-79.9M—
Returns
ROE12.3%12.3%7.9%—
Valuation
P/E28.1428.14120.11—
EV/EBITDA16.9816.9831.99—
P/B2.782.789.47—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth17.8%17.8%——
EPS Growth381.2%381.2%——
Dividend Yield0.8%0.8%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

26.2%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$10.76

Spread vs growth

355.0%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

19.4%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$13.02

Spread vs growth

361.7%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

14.6%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$20.97

Spread vs growth

366.5%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -21.4%

Total return

-21.4%

Start / end P/E

140.0x → 22.6x

EPS bridge

1.11 → 5.36

Residual

-319.6%

EPS growth+381.2%
Multiple rerating-83.8%
Dividend+0.8%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-319.6%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.