StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
4170.TWO$13.55+1.12%
Fair $13.55+0.0%

4170.TWO

4170.TWO

Healthcare / BiotechnologyTaipei Exchange

$13.55

+0.15 (+1.12%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $13.55Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 47/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-9.8M · quality 46.3/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 13/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

47/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 4170.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · 4170.TWO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$593M

P/E

6.2x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.4x

↓

ROE

19.8%

↑

Gross Margin

35.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$14
$11$18

TradingView lightweight chart

4170.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $13.55Periodo -59.2%
Fair value: $13.55

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+12.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-15.9%

FCF / Net income

-0.10x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $61.4M · net income $96.2M · FCF $-9.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

35.3%+33.7% pts

Operating margin

-35.7%+35.5% pts

Net margin

156.6%+218.2% pts

FCF margin

-15.9%-48.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$61.4M$61.4M$57.8M$55.9M$42.9M
Net Income$96.2M$96.2M$-40.1M$-6.6M$-26.4M
EBITDA$104.3M$104.3M$-31.3M$-7.0M$-21.7M
EPS——-0.92-0.15-0.60
Gross Margin35.3%35.3%29.4%29.4%1.6%
Operating Margin-35.7%-35.7%-45.0%-28.9%-71.2%
Net Margin156.6%156.6%-69.3%-11.8%-61.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.00———
Current Ratio11.8511.85———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-9.8M$-9.8M$-14.4M$-3.5M$13.8M
Returns
ROE19.8%19.8%-10.3%-1.5%-6.0%
Valuation
P/E6.196.19———
EV/EBITDA5.445.44———
P/B1.221.221.631.991.15
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth6.3%6.3%3.4%30.2%—
EPS Growth——-513.3%75.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +4.6%

Total return

+4.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.92 → n/d

Residual

+4.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+4.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.