StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
4194.TWO$7.21-1.52%
Fair $7.21+0.0%

4194.TWO

Holy Stone Healthcare Co., Ltd.

Healthcare / BiotechnologyTaipei Exchange

$7.21

-0.11 (-1.52%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $7.21Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 15/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-144.8M · quality 77.3/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 42/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

15/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists. ROE is -60.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 4194.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · Holy Stone Healthcare Co., Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.1B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-60.9%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.06

↓
52-Week Range$7
$5$13

TradingView lightweight chart

4194.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $7.120Periodo -93.1%
Fair value: $7.210

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

1.05x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-111.3M · FCF $-116.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue——$118.8M$236.9M$270.2M
Net Income$-111.3M$-111.3M$-183.5M$-289.4M$-152.9M
EBITDA$-98.6M$-98.6M$-170.8M$-266.4M$-128.4M
EPS——-1.29-2.12-1.27
Gross Margin——27.7%42.0%45.6%
Operating Margin——-159.8%-121.7%-55.5%
Net Margin——-154.5%-122.2%-56.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.060.060.050.920.06
Current Ratio5.295.29———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-116.4M$-116.4M$-144.8M$-280.8M$-148.1M
Returns
ROE-60.9%-60.9%-62.4%-347.1%-29.3%
Valuation
P/B5.765.766.1231.257.19
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth——-49.9%-12.3%—
EPS Growth——39.2%-66.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +1.7%

Total return

+1.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.29 → n/d

Residual

+1.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+1.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.