StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
4287.T$478.00+0.42%
Fair $478.00+0.0%

4287.T

Just Planning Inc.

Technology / Computer HardwareTokyo

$478.00

+2.00 (+0.42%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $478.00Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 49/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $341.1M · quality 64.0/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 81/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

49/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 4287.TLocal privado en este navegador · Just Planning Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$5.6B

P/E

11.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

3.6x

↓

ROE

12.9%

↑

Gross Margin

49.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$478
$376$597

TradingView lightweight chart

4287.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $478.00Periodo +163.4%
Fair value: $478.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+8.1%

FCF CAGR

+20.2%

FCF margin

26.3%

FCF / Net income

1.31x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $2.53B · net income $508.2M · FCF $665.8M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

49.6%+1.3% pts

Operating margin

24.0%+4.4% pts

Net margin

20.1%+9.8% pts

FCF margin

26.3%+7.2% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$2.53B$2.53B$2.20B$2.07B$2.01B
Net Income$508.2M$508.2M$364.2M$354.5M$206.1M
EBITDA$663.0M$663.0M$549.1M$555.4M$394.7M
EPS——29.5527.9016.18
Gross Margin49.6%49.6%51.0%52.7%48.3%
Operating Margin24.0%24.0%22.3%23.8%19.6%
Net Margin20.1%20.1%16.5%17.1%10.3%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio9.549.54———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$665.8M$665.8M$284.5M$341.1M$383.7M
Returns
ROE12.9%12.9%9.9%9.9%6.1%
Valuation
P/E11.1111.1112.0112.1118.73
EV/EBITDA3.553.552.742.412.50
P/B1.431.431.191.201.14
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth15.0%15.0%6.3%3.2%—
EPS Growth——5.9%72.4%—
Dividend Yield2.7%2.7%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +28.8%

Total return

+28.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

29.55 → n/d

Residual

+26.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+2.7%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+26.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.