StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
4591.T$69.00-1.43%
Fair $69.00+0.0%

4591.T

Ribomic Inc.

Healthcare / BiotechnologyTokyo

$69.00

-1.00 (-1.43%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $69.00Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 5/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 16%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.0B · quality 37.3/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 17/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

5/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists. ROE is -33.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 4591.TLocal privado en este navegador · Ribomic Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$3.7B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-33.5%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$69
$68$141

TradingView lightweight chart

4591.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $69.00Periodo -96.4%
Fair value: $69.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-70.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-48874.6%

FCF / Net income

1.01x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $2.1M · net income $-1.02B · FCF $-1.03B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

-49861.8%-47701.3% pts

Net margin

-48359.7%-46277.4% pts

FCF margin

-48874.6%-47008.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$2.1M$2.1M—$66.0M$80.9M
Net Income$-1.02B$-1.02B$-1.02B$-1.65B$-1.68B
EBITDA$-1.05B$-1.05B$-1.11B$-1.79B$-1.73B
EPS-25.21-25.21-28.70-53.14-59.95
Operating Margin-49861.8%-49861.8%—-2707.4%-2160.6%
Net Margin-48359.7%-48359.7%—-2505.7%-2082.3%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio21.6921.69———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.03B$-1.03B$-955.5M$-1.73B$-1.51B
Returns
ROE-33.5%-33.5%-30.2%-37.7%-35.9%
Valuation
P/B0.920.920.911.311.25
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth———-18.5%—
EPS Growth12.2%12.2%46.0%11.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -23.3%

Total return

-23.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-28.70 → -25.21

Residual

-23.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-23.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.