StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
474650.KQ$43700.00-7.02%
Fair $43700.00+0.0%

474650.KQ

474650.KQ

Technology / Computer HardwareKOSDAQ

$43700.00

-3300.00 (-7.02%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $43700.00Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 13/F
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-12.6B · quality 70.0/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 40/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

13/100

F

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -18.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 474650.KQLocal privado en este navegador · 474650.KQ
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$243.8B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-18.3%

↓

Gross Margin

5.5%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.56

↑
52-Week Range$43700
$16630$93300

TradingView lightweight chart

474650.KQ price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $43,700Periodo +90.8%
Fair value: $43,700

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+33.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-218.8%

FCF / Net income

4.11x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $13.12B · net income $-6.98B · FCF $-28.72B

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

5.5%-49.1% pts

Operating margin

-56.2%-66.8% pts

Net margin

-53.2%+112.3% pts

FCF margin

-218.8%-155.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$13.12B$13.12B$11.19B$7.36B
Net Income$-6.98B$-6.98B$-2.54B$-12.18B
EBITDA$-4.82B$-4.82B$-798.5M$-11.10B
EPS——-995.00-6585.00
Gross Margin5.5%5.5%24.2%54.7%
Operating Margin-56.2%-56.2%-35.3%10.6%
Net Margin-53.2%-53.2%-22.7%-165.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.560.560.50-0.27
Current Ratio1.791.79——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-28.72B$-28.72B$-12.64B$-4.66B
Returns
ROE-18.3%-18.3%-11.4%69.0%
Valuation
P/B6.396.39——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth17.3%17.3%52.0%—
EPS Growth——84.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +90.8%

Total return

+90.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-995.00 → n/d

Residual

+90.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+90.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.