StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5011.KL$1.24+0.00%
Fair $1.24+0.0%

5011.KL

Mesiniaga Berhad

Technology / Information Technology ServicesKuala Lumpur

$1.24

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.24Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 32/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-11.2M · quality 51.3/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 26/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

32/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 5011.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Mesiniaga Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$75M

P/E

8.9x

↓

EV/EBITDA

13.1x

↑

ROE

9.8%

↑

Gross Margin

10.5%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.53

↑
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

5011.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.240Periodo -87.7%
Fair value: $1.240

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-7.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-8.3%

FCF / Net income

-1.62x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $231.9M · net income $11.9M · FCF $-19.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

10.5%+3.0% pts

Operating margin

3.1%+1.1% pts

Net margin

5.1%+2.9% pts

FCF margin

-8.3%-10.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$231.9M$231.9M$180.4M$259.8M$292.9M
Net Income$11.9M$11.9M$-3.4M$3.9M$6.5M
EBITDA$9.8M$9.8M$-4.0M$5.4M$8.8M
EPS——-0.060.060.11
Gross Margin10.5%10.5%2.8%7.5%7.5%
Operating Margin3.1%3.1%-3.4%1.0%2.0%
Net Margin5.1%5.1%-1.9%1.5%2.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.530.530.150.140.12
Current Ratio1.541.54———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-19.2M$-19.2M$-11.2M$6.5M$7.2M
Returns
ROE9.8%9.8%-3.1%3.5%5.9%
Valuation
P/E8.868.86—22.4514.76
EV/EBITDA13.1313.13—14.178.78
P/B0.620.620.910.790.87
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth28.6%28.6%-30.6%-11.3%—
EPS Growth——-186.5%-40.0%—
Dividend Yield4.0%4.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -10.5%

Total return

-10.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.06 → n/d

Residual

-14.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+4.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-14.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.