StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5028.KL$1.38+2.99%
Fair $1.38+0.0%

5028.KL

HeiTech Padu Berhad

Technology / Information Technology ServicesKuala Lumpur

$1.38

+0.04 (+2.99%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.38Fund rank 20/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 35/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 15%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-108.3M · quality 29.3/100

Data gap 20/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 6/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

35/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 5028.KLLocal privado en este navegador · HeiTech Padu Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$225M

P/E

8.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

14.1x

↑

ROE

8.6%

↑

Gross Margin

19.2%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.83

↑
52-Week Range$1
$1$2

TradingView lightweight chart

5028.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.380Periodo -55.5%
Fair value: $1.380

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+30.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-29.4%

FCF / Net income

-9.32x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $651.2M · net income $20.5M · FCF $-191.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

19.2%-6.2% pts

Operating margin

9.5%+3.4% pts

Net margin

3.1%+6.5% pts

FCF margin

-29.4%-23.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$651.2M$651.2M$337.0M$277.9M$293.9M
Net Income$20.5M$20.5M$6.7M$7.2M$-9.9M
EBITDA$41.5M$41.5M$25.8M$27.1M$7.7M
EPS——0.060.06-0.08
Gross Margin19.2%19.2%27.8%35.2%25.3%
Operating Margin9.5%9.5%10.1%12.8%6.1%
Net Margin3.1%3.1%2.0%2.6%-3.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.831.831.361.211.39
Current Ratio1.161.16———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-191.2M$-191.2M$-108.3M$12.9M$-17.5M
Returns
ROE8.6%8.6%3.9%4.9%-11.2%
Valuation
P/E8.128.1239.3713.15—
EV/EBITDA14.1414.1418.188.7722.19
P/B0.940.941.520.650.80
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth93.3%93.3%21.3%-5.4%—
EPS Growth——11.7%172.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -14.6%

Total return

-14.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.06 → n/d

Residual

-14.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-14.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.