StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5031.T$475.00-6.86%
Fair $475.00+0.0%

5031.T

Moi Corporation

Technology / Software - ApplicationTokyo

$475.00

-35.00 (-6.86%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $475.00Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 43/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $476.1M · quality 39.3/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 32/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

43/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 5031.TLocal privado en este navegador · Moi Corporation
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$6.6B

P/E

65.2x

↑

EV/EBITDA

9.2x

↓

ROE

5.2%

↑

Gross Margin

50.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$475
$221$930

TradingView lightweight chart

5031.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $475.00Periodo -53.8%
Fair value: $475.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+0.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

0.9%

FCF / Net income

0.62x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $6.69B · net income $101.7M · FCF $63.2M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

50.1%+0.1% pts

Operating margin

5.1%+3.5% pts

Net margin

1.5%+0.7% pts

FCF margin

0.9%+3.2% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$6.69B$6.69B$6.59B$6.43B$6.61B
Net Income$101.7M$101.7M$27.8M$194.1M$53.4M
EBITDA$395.9M$395.9M$294.2M$225.2M$189.1M
EPS——1.9913.893.88
Gross Margin50.1%50.1%51.0%49.9%50.0%
Operating Margin5.1%5.1%3.5%2.2%1.6%
Net Margin1.5%1.5%0.4%3.0%0.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity———0.000.00
Current Ratio1.701.70———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$63.2M$63.2M$714.4M$476.1M$-150.7M
Returns
ROE5.2%5.2%1.5%10.5%3.3%
Valuation
P/E65.1665.16121.6117.1395.62
EV/EBITDA9.229.221.365.1317.76
P/B3.363.361.811.803.12
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth1.5%1.5%2.5%-2.6%—
EPS Growth——-85.7%258.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +100.4%

Total return

+100.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.99 → n/d

Residual

+100.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+100.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.