StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5069.KL$15.00+0.00%
Fair $15.00+0.0%

5069.KL

BLD Plantation Bhd.

Consumer Defensive / Farm ProductsKuala Lumpur

$15.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $15.00Fund rank 33/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 43/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $97.4M · quality 61.0/100

Data gap 33/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 43/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

43/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 5069.KLLocal privado en este navegador · BLD Plantation Bhd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.3B

P/E

30.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

14.8x

↑

ROE

5.4%

↓

Gross Margin

9.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.15

↓
52-Week Range$15
$11$17

TradingView lightweight chart

5069.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $15.00Periodo +527.6%
Fair value: $15.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-6.0%

FCF CAGR

+4.3%

FCF margin

9.9%

FCF / Net income

4.37x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $2.05B · net income $46.4M · FCF $202.8M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

9.9%+1.6% pts

Operating margin

3.7%+1.7% pts

Net margin

2.3%+1.0% pts

FCF margin

9.9%+2.6% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$2.05B$2.05B$1.76B$1.71B$2.47B
Net Income$46.4M$46.4M$63.7M$28.8M$30.3M
EBITDA$75.2M$75.2M$100.1M$105.2M$102.1M
EPS——0.680.310.32
Gross Margin9.9%9.9%10.1%8.9%8.3%
Operating Margin3.7%3.7%5.7%2.5%1.9%
Net Margin2.3%2.3%3.6%1.7%1.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.150.150.220.150.39
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$202.8M$202.8M$97.4M$-43.8M$178.5M
Returns
ROE5.4%5.4%7.8%3.8%4.1%
Valuation
P/E30.0030.0014.7535.6830.95
EV/EBITDA14.7814.788.459.718.58
P/B1.621.621.141.351.28
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth16.9%16.9%2.7%-30.8%—
EPS Growth——120.8%-4.8%—
Dividend Yield0.2%0.2%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +39.1%

Total return

+39.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.68 → n/d

Residual

+38.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.2%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+38.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.