StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5178.KL$0.03+0.00%
Fair $0.03+0.0%

5178.KL

Ingenieur Gudang Berhad

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionKuala Lumpur

$0.03

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.03Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 52/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $4.8M · quality 49.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 23/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

52/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 5178.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Ingenieur Gudang Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$45M

P/E

3.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.2x

↓

ROE

5.1%

↓

Gross Margin

33.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.13

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

5178.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.030Periodo -95.1%
Fair value: $0.030

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+51.1%

FCF CAGR

-35.1%

FCF margin

17.0%

FCF / Net income

0.75x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $44.7M · net income $10.1M · FCF $7.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

33.1%-36.4% pts

Operating margin

26.5%+8.4% pts

Net margin

22.5%-126.0% pts

FCF margin

17.0%-197.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$44.7M$44.7M$49.4M$20.3M$13.0M
Net Income$10.1M$10.1M$25.3M$17.9M$19.3M
EBITDA$12.2M$12.2M$31.7M$27.3M$22.5M
EPS——0.020.020.02
Gross Margin33.1%33.1%37.2%39.4%69.5%
Operating Margin26.5%26.5%35.5%37.8%18.1%
Net Margin22.5%22.5%51.2%88.2%148.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.130.130.150.210.68
Current Ratio1.471.47———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$7.6M$7.6M$4.8M$-35.6M$27.8M
Returns
ROE5.1%5.1%13.4%11.2%18.8%
Valuation
P/E3.003.002.697.495.14
EV/EBITDA5.225.222.816.807.40
P/B0.230.230.360.970.97
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-9.5%-9.5%142.7%56.8%—
EPS Growth——0.0%-22.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -14.3%

Total return

-14.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.02 → n/d

Residual

-14.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-14.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.