StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5195.KL$0.20+2.63%
Fair $0.20+0.0%

5195.KL

Censof Holdings Berhad

Technology / Software - ApplicationKuala Lumpur

$0.20

+0.00 (+2.63%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.20Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 50/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $2.1M · quality 62.3/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 40/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

50/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 5195.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Censof Holdings Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$108M

P/E

19.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.1x

↓

ROE

6.4%

↑

Gross Margin

37.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

5195.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.195Periodo -59.4%
Fair value: $0.195

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+2.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-0.4%

FCF / Net income

-0.06x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $109.7M · net income $6.9M · FCF $-400000.0

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

37.0%-1.4% pts

Operating margin

10.2%-0.2% pts

Net margin

6.3%+0.5% pts

FCF margin

-0.4%-4.0% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$109.7M$109.7M$101.2M$101.3M$102.5M
Net Income$6.9M$6.9M$2.7M$4.4M$5.9M
EBITDA$15.8M$15.8M$12.0M$12.6M$16.0M
EPS——0.000.010.01
Gross Margin37.0%37.0%37.8%36.2%38.4%
Operating Margin10.2%10.2%7.4%6.7%10.3%
Net Margin6.3%6.3%2.6%4.4%5.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.020.020.030.03
Current Ratio3.313.31———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-400000.00$-400000.00$2.1M$4.3M$3.8M
Returns
ROE6.4%6.4%2.6%4.4%5.8%
Valuation
P/E19.5019.5040.8231.8723.36
EV/EBITDA6.126.128.029.947.48
P/B1.001.001.091.381.36
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth8.4%8.4%-0.1%-1.2%—
EPS Growth——-38.8%-25.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -11.4%

Total return

-11.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.00 → n/d

Residual

-11.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-11.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.