StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5252.KL$0.17+6.45%
Fair $0.17+0.0%

5252.KL

Sasbadi Holdings Berhad

Communication Services / PublishingKuala Lumpur

$0.17

+0.01 (+6.45%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.17Fund rank 33/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 37/D
F-Score: 2/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $7.0M · quality 66.0/100

Data gap 33/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 77/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

37/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 5Warnings: 0unknown: 5
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 5252.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Sasbadi Holdings Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$70M

P/E

8.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

2.1x

↓

ROE

N/A

•

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

5252.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.165Periodo -66.8%
Fair value: $0.165

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

—

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income — · FCF $15.8M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue——$90.1M$96.1M$69.0M$62.9M
Net Income——$2.2M$10.2M$841000.00$-9.3M
EBITDA$20.8M$20.8M$7.9M$17.7M$6.4M—
EPS0.030.030.010.020.00—
Gross Margin——32.3%38.0%33.4%—
Operating Margin——4.0%13.8%2.8%—
Net Margin——2.5%10.6%1.2%-14.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity——0.060.060.090.14
Current Ratio3.053.05————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$15.8M$15.8M$6.7M$7.0M$7.9M—
Returns
ROE——1.4%6.6%0.6%-6.7%
Valuation
P/E8.258.2529.418.6552.50—
EV/EBITDA2.112.118.134.867.53—
P/B——0.430.570.320.66
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth——-6.3%39.3%9.7%—
EPS Growth403.9%403.9%-78.5%1085.0%——
Dividend Yield4.6%4.6%————

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-17.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.01

Spread vs growth

421.0%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-7.2%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.02

Spread vs growth

411.1%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

1.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.03

Spread vs growth

402.9%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +7.7%

Total return

+7.7%

Start / end P/E

31.4x → 6.4x

EPS bridge

0.01 → 0.03

Residual

-321.3%

EPS growth+403.9%
Multiple rerating-79.5%
Dividend+4.6%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-321.3%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.