StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5265.KL$0.13+0.00%
Fair $0.13+0.0%

5265.KL

Oasis Harvest Corporation Berhad

Industrials / Specialty Industrial MachineryKuala Lumpur

$0.13

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.13Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 10/F
F-Score: 6/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-5.5M · quality 47.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 10/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

10/100

F

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -27.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 5265.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Oasis Harvest Corporation Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$18M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-27.2%

↓

Gross Margin

32.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.27

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

5265.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.125Periodo -97.5%
Fair value: $0.125

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2023 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+40.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

49.8%

FCF / Net income

-1.00x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $17.7M · net income $-8.9M · FCF $8.8M

2021-FY → 2023-FY

Gross margin

32.1%-11.2% pts

Operating margin

-62.7%+19.0% pts

Net margin

-50.0%+407.6% pts

FCF margin

49.8%+156.4% pts
MetricTTM
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$17.7M$17.7M$9.5M$8.9M
Net Income$-8.9M$-8.9M$-15.3M$-40.9M
EBITDA$-5.8M$-5.8M$-12.6M$-36.8M
EPS-0.07-0.07-0.14-0.44
Gross Margin32.1%32.1%36.5%43.3%
Operating Margin-62.7%-62.7%-65.4%-81.7%
Net Margin-50.0%-50.0%-161.0%-457.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.270.270.390.35
Current Ratio0.920.92——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$8.8M$8.8M$-5.5M$-9.5M
Returns
ROE-27.2%-27.2%-66.7%-139.9%
Valuation
P/B0.510.512.062.72
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth86.0%86.0%6.5%—
EPS Growth53.8%53.8%66.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -24.2%

Total return

-24.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.14 → -0.07

Residual

-24.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-24.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.