StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5300.KL$0.77+0.65%
Fair $0.77+0.0%

5300.KL

Yenher Holdings Berhad

Consumer Defensive / Packaged FoodsKuala Lumpur

$0.77

+0.00 (+0.65%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.77Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 42/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-11.0M · quality 44.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 13/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

42/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 5300.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Yenher Holdings Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$231M

P/E

9.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.2x

↓

ROE

7.7%

↑

Gross Margin

18.5%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

5300.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.770Periodo -14.4%
Fair value: $0.770

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-6.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-5.5%

FCF / Net income

-0.78x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $291.4M · net income $20.7M · FCF $-16.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

18.5%+3.5% pts

Operating margin

10.1%+2.0% pts

Net margin

7.1%+1.0% pts

FCF margin

-5.5%-6.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$291.4M$291.4M$272.3M$320.4M$355.3M
Net Income$20.7M$20.7M$21.6M$21.2M$21.7M
EBITDA$30.3M$30.3M$31.2M$30.0M$30.8M
EPS——0.070.070.07
Gross Margin18.5%18.5%19.4%15.2%15.1%
Operating Margin10.1%10.1%10.4%8.5%8.0%
Net Margin7.1%7.1%7.9%6.6%6.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.000.010.010.01
Current Ratio3.353.35———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-16.1M$-16.1M$-11.0M$28.8M$5.0M
Returns
ROE7.7%7.7%8.4%9.0%10.1%
Valuation
P/E9.639.6312.8712.1611.33
EV/EBITDA7.207.208.367.457.18
P/B0.860.861.081.101.15
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth7.0%7.0%-15.0%-9.8%—
EPS Growth——1.7%-2.3%—
Dividend Yield3.9%3.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +0.1%

Total return

+0.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.07 → n/d

Residual

-3.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-3.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.