StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5323.KL$1.63-0.61%
Fair $1.63+0.0%

5323.KL

5323.KL

Consumer Defensive / Farm ProductsKuala Lumpur

$1.63

-0.01 (-0.61%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.63Fund rank 37/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 49/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 23% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $277.4M · quality 78.7/100

Data gap 37/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 83/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

49/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 5323.KLLocal privado en este navegador · 5323.KL
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$4.1B

P/E

12.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.8x

↓

ROE

11.5%

↑

Gross Margin

36.9%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.55

↑
52-Week Range$2
$1$2

TradingView lightweight chart

5323.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.630Periodo +81.1%
Fair value: $1.630

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-0.5%

FCF CAGR

+0.7%

FCF margin

16.1%

FCF / Net income

0.80x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.72B · net income $345.0M · FCF $277.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

36.9%-7.0% pts

Operating margin

29.2%-6.9% pts

Net margin

20.0%-8.3% pts

FCF margin

16.1%+0.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.72B$1.72B$1.52B$1.25B$1.75B
Net Income$345.0M$345.0M$257.3M$167.3M$495.6M
EBITDA$644.9M$644.9M$539.0M$386.2M$748.6M
EPS——0.110.070.20
Gross Margin36.9%36.9%36.2%29.0%44.0%
Operating Margin29.2%29.2%27.1%21.9%36.1%
Net Margin20.0%20.0%16.9%13.3%28.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.550.550.530.770.90
Current Ratio3.313.31———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$277.4M$277.4M$347.7M$217.3M$271.5M
Returns
ROE11.5%11.5%9.1%7.5%25.1%
Valuation
P/E12.5412.5411.27——
EV/EBITDA7.797.797.35——
P/B1.361.361.00——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth13.1%13.1%21.7%-28.4%—
EPS Growth——64.4%-66.2%—
Dividend Yield7.1%7.1%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +43.0%

Total return

+43.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.11 → n/d

Residual

+35.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+7.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+35.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.