StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5325.KL$1.36+1.49%
Fair $1.36+0.0%

5325.KL

Well Chip Group Berhad

Consumer Cyclical / Luxury GoodsKuala Lumpur

$1.36

+0.02 (+1.49%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.36Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 46/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-50.5M · quality 52.3/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 20/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

46/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 5325.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Well Chip Group Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$816M

P/E

8.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

10.1x

↑

ROE

17.8%

↑

Gross Margin

58.4%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.95

↑
52-Week Range$1
$1$2

TradingView lightweight chart

5325.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.360Periodo -20.9%
Fair value: $1.360

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+19.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-64.6%

FCF / Net income

-2.03x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $270.2M · net income $86.1M · FCF $-174.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

58.4%+18.9% pts

Operating margin

43.9%+19.2% pts

Net margin

31.9%+15.2% pts

FCF margin

-64.6%-24.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$270.2M$270.2M$222.1M$203.7M$158.1M
Net Income$86.1M$86.1M$50.0M$36.4M$26.4M
EBITDA$125.4M$125.4M$75.9M$54.1M$40.1M
EPS——0.100.060.04
Gross Margin58.4%58.4%47.3%38.0%39.5%
Operating Margin43.9%43.9%31.4%24.6%24.7%
Net Margin31.9%31.9%22.5%17.9%16.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.950.950.601.411.48
Current Ratio1.941.94———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-174.6M$-174.6M$-50.5M$-39.3M$-63.9M
Returns
ROE17.8%17.8%11.9%17.9%15.3%
Valuation
P/E8.508.5011.16——
EV/EBITDA10.0610.069.76——
P/B1.691.691.32——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth21.6%21.6%9.1%28.8%—
EPS Growth——59.4%38.2%—
Dividend Yield3.8%3.8%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +23.0%

Total return

+23.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.10 → n/d

Residual

+19.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.8%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+19.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.