StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5335.KL$2.25+0.00%
Fair $2.25+0.0%

5335.KL

HI Mobility Berhad

Industrials / RailroadsKuala Lumpur

$2.25

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.25Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 46/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $22.4M · quality 44.7/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 28/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

46/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 5335.KLLocal privado en este navegador · HI Mobility Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.2B

P/E

18.8x

↑

EV/EBITDA

12.4x

↑

ROE

20.4%

↑

Gross Margin

26.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.66

↑
52-Week Range$2
$1$3

TradingView lightweight chart

5335.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.250Periodo +69.2%
Fair value: $2.250

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+38.5%

FCF CAGR

+38.3%

FCF margin

7.0%

FCF / Net income

0.40x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $317.7M · net income $56.5M · FCF $22.4M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

26.5%-1.0% pts

Operating margin

22.2%+1.9% pts

Net margin

17.8%+1.5% pts

FCF margin

7.0%-0.0% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$317.7M$317.7M$279.8M$207.7M$119.6M
Net Income$56.5M$56.5M$43.8M$33.2M$19.5M
EBITDA$102.9M$102.9M$80.2M$65.8M$36.7M
EPS——0.090.070.04
Gross Margin26.5%26.5%27.8%30.5%27.5%
Operating Margin22.2%22.2%20.5%23.4%20.3%
Net Margin17.8%17.8%15.6%16.0%16.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.660.661.341.471.56
Current Ratio1.981.98———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$22.4M$22.4M$-10.9M$48.7M$8.5M
Returns
ROE20.4%20.4%33.3%47.0%34.2%
Valuation
P/E18.7518.75———
EV/EBITDA12.4512.45———
P/B4.074.07———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth13.5%13.5%34.7%73.6%—
EPS Growth——31.9%70.0%—
Dividend Yield1.8%1.8%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +77.6%

Total return

+77.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.09 → n/d

Residual

+75.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+1.8%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+75.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.