StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5341.KL$0.78+0.00%
Fair $0.78+0.0%

5341.KL

5341.KL

Healthcare / Medical DevicesKuala Lumpur

$0.78

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.78Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 50/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $21.7M · quality 50.3/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 30/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

50/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 5341.KLLocal privado en este navegador · 5341.KL
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$312M

P/E

4.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

8.4x

↓

ROE

18.5%

↑

Gross Margin

29.0%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.23

↑
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

5341.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.780Periodo +2.0%
Fair value: $0.780

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+23.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-5.7%

FCF / Net income

-0.53x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $201.6M · net income $21.9M · FCF $-11.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

29.0%+1.1% pts

Operating margin

15.6%-2.9% pts

Net margin

10.9%-1.4% pts

FCF margin

-5.7%-8.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$201.6M$201.6M$183.2M$150.3M$106.6M
Net Income$21.9M$21.9M$20.4M$20.7M$13.1M
EBITDA$32.9M$32.9M$27.9M$27.0M$18.2M
EPS——0.050.050.03
Gross Margin29.0%29.0%24.8%27.3%27.9%
Operating Margin15.6%15.6%15.1%16.3%18.5%
Net Margin10.9%10.9%11.1%13.8%12.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.230.230.430.641.40
Current Ratio2.192.19———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-11.6M$-11.6M$30.2M$21.7M$2.6M
Returns
ROE18.5%18.5%42.7%52.0%52.0%
Valuation
P/E4.114.11———
EV/EBITDA8.358.35———
P/B2.632.63———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth10.1%10.1%21.9%41.0%—
EPS Growth——-1.7%58.8%—
Dividend Yield0.8%0.8%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +2.8%

Total return

+2.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.05 → n/d

Residual

+2.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.8%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+2.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.