StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5345.KL$0.30-1.64%
Fair $0.30+0.0%

5345.KL

Geohan Corporation Berhad

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionKuala Lumpur

$0.30

-0.00 (-1.64%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.30Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 44/C
F-Score: 2/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $41.6M · quality 51.3/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 36/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

44/100

C

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 5345.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Geohan Corporation Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$132M

P/E

1.9x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.7x

↓

ROE

6.3%

↑

Gross Margin

10.5%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.55

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

5345.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.300Periodo -44.4%
Fair value: $0.300

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+20.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-9.1%

FCF / Net income

-2.46x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $367.6M · net income $13.6M · FCF $-33.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

10.5%+0.3% pts

Operating margin

5.8%+0.5% pts

Net margin

3.7%+0.5% pts

FCF margin

-9.1%-23.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$367.6M$367.6M$395.2M$323.8M$208.0M
Net Income$13.6M$13.6M$13.8M$13.9M$6.7M
EBITDA$52.7M$52.7M$50.6M$41.2M$31.5M
EPS——0.030.030.02
Gross Margin10.5%10.5%11.4%10.9%10.2%
Operating Margin5.8%5.8%5.6%5.3%5.2%
Net Margin3.7%3.7%3.5%4.3%3.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.550.550.870.820.89
Current Ratio1.441.44———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-33.5M$-33.5M$45.9M$41.6M$29.6M
Returns
ROE6.3%6.3%12.0%12.8%7.0%
Valuation
P/E1.881.88———
EV/EBITDA4.694.69———
P/B0.610.61———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-7.0%-7.0%22.0%55.7%—
EPS Growth——-0.9%108.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -44.4%

Total return

-44.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.03 → n/d

Residual

-44.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-44.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.