StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5348.KL$0.89+0.56%
Fair $0.89+0.0%

5348.KL

Orkim Berhad

Industrials / Marine ShippingKuala Lumpur

$0.89

+0.00 (+0.56%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.89Fund rank 35/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 38/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $81.2M · quality 67.3/100

Data gap 35/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 66/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

38/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 5348.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Orkim Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$890M

P/E

2.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.0x

↓

ROE

12.2%

↑

Gross Margin

33.9%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.65

↑
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

5348.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.890Periodo -4.3%
Fair value: $0.890

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-0.6%

FCF CAGR

-58.3%

FCF margin

2.6%

FCF / Net income

0.11x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $309.9M · net income $76.2M · FCF $8.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

33.9%+4.0% pts

Operating margin

27.7%-0.6% pts

Net margin

24.6%+15.7% pts

FCF margin

2.6%-33.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$309.9M$309.9M$316.6M$302.6M$315.6M
Net Income$76.2M$76.2M$92.9M$81.0M$27.9M
EBITDA$158.2M$158.2M$171.1M$157.0M$106.9M
EPS——0.090.080.03
Gross Margin33.9%33.9%36.3%37.7%29.9%
Operating Margin27.7%27.7%33.2%34.9%28.4%
Net Margin24.6%24.6%29.3%26.8%8.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.650.650.570.791.14
Current Ratio3.403.40———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$8.2M$8.2M$81.2M$118.9M$112.5M
Returns
ROE12.2%12.2%17.1%17.6%7.4%
Valuation
P/E2.342.34———
EV/EBITDA7.057.05———
P/B1.431.43———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-2.1%-2.1%4.6%-4.1%—
EPS Growth——14.6%190.1%—
Dividend Yield4.0%4.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -0.3%

Total return

-0.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.09 → n/d

Residual

-4.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+4.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-4.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.