StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
550A.T$2586.00+11.42%
Fair $2586.00+0.0%

550A.T

550A.T

Technology / Information Technology ServicesTokyo

$2586.00

+265.00 (+11.42%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2586.00Fund rank 35/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 41/C
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $244.8M · quality 72.0/100

Data gap 35/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 60/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

41/100

C

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 0unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 550A.TLocal privado en este navegador · 550A.T
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.3B

P/E

10.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

3.4x

↓

ROE

17.3%

↑

Gross Margin

27.2%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$2586
$1922$5220

TradingView lightweight chart

550A.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2,586Periodo -1.0%
Fair value: $2,586

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2024–2025 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+5.6%

FCF CAGR

-45.9%

FCF margin

4.8%

FCF / Net income

0.81x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.56B · net income $211.0M · FCF $171.9M

2024-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

27.2%+0.4% pts

Operating margin

8.0%-0.4% pts

Net margin

5.9%+0.3% pts

FCF margin

4.8%-4.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
Income Statement
Revenue$3.56B$3.56B$3.38B
Net Income$211.0M$211.0M$190.7M
EBITDA$306.7M$306.7M$305.6M
EPS274.04274.04250.65
Gross Margin27.2%27.2%26.8%
Operating Margin8.0%8.0%8.4%
Net Margin5.9%5.9%5.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.000.04
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$171.9M$171.9M$317.7M
Returns
ROE17.3%17.3%18.2%
Valuation
P/E10.6110.61—
EV/EBITDA3.363.36—
P/B1.631.63—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth5.6%5.6%—
EPS Growth9.3%9.3%—
Dividend Yield6.0%6.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-5.7%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$229.46

Spread vs growth

15.1%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

0.3%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$277.65

Spread vs growth

9.1%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

5.0%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$447.16

Spread vs growth

4.3%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total +5.0%

Total return

+5.0%

Start / end P/E

10.4x → 9.4x

EPS bridge

250.65 → 274.04

Residual

-0.9%

EPS growth+9.3%
Multiple rerating-9.5%
Dividend+6.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-0.9%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.