StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5587.T$820.00+0.49%
Fair $820.00+0.0%

5587.T

Inbound Platform Corp.

Industrials / Specialty Business ServicesTokyo

$820.00

+4.00 (+0.49%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $820.00Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 54/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $314.4M · quality 49.7/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 21/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

54/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 5587.TLocal privado en este navegador · Inbound Platform Corp.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.8B

P/E

10.4x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.0x

↓

ROE

14.3%

↑

Gross Margin

75.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.18

↓
52-Week Range$820
$618$1372

TradingView lightweight chart

5587.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $820.00Periodo -65.7%
Fair value: $820.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+38.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

10.5%

FCF / Net income

1.55x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.01B · net income $202.8M · FCF $314.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

75.3%+11.4% pts

Operating margin

9.9%-1.6% pts

Net margin

6.7%-1.8% pts

FCF margin

10.5%+12.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3.01B$3.01B$2.33B$2.08B$1.14B
Net Income$202.8M$202.8M$127.1M$252.0M$96.9M
EBITDA$431.1M$431.1M$335.1M$480.4M$168.7M
EPS——35.5579.5531.00
Gross Margin75.3%75.3%60.4%59.5%63.9%
Operating Margin9.9%9.9%7.7%16.1%11.5%
Net Margin6.7%6.7%5.4%12.1%8.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.180.180.170.250.88
Current Ratio1.291.29———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$314.4M$314.4M$-128.8M$341.4M$-23.6M
Returns
ROE14.3%14.3%10.6%24.0%26.6%
Valuation
P/E10.4410.4419.8023.05—
EV/EBITDA5.025.026.3010.14—
P/B1.991.992.095.54—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth28.8%28.8%12.3%82.4%—
EPS Growth——-55.3%156.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -4.2%

Total return

-4.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

35.55 → n/d

Residual

-4.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-4.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.