StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5GZ.SI$0.02-5.88%
Fair $0.02+0.0%

5GZ.SI

HGH Holdings Ltd.

Industrials / Electrical Equipment & PartsSES

$0.02

-0.00 (-5.88%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.02Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-2.6M · quality 40.0/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 12/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 5GZ.SILocal privado en este navegador · HGH Holdings Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$28M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

3.3x

↓

ROE

10.2%

↑

Gross Margin

25.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.32

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

5GZ.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.016Periodo -60.1%
Fair value: $0.016

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+36.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-5.6%

FCF / Net income

-0.59x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $54.6M · net income $5.2M · FCF $-3.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

25.5%+7.8% pts

Operating margin

11.8%+22.0% pts

Net margin

9.6%+16.5% pts

FCF margin

-5.6%-4.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$54.6M$54.6M$21.3M$20.0M$21.6M
Net Income$5.2M$5.2M$-199897.00$-307000.00$-1.5M
EBITDA$11.6M$11.6M$4.0M$3.5M$2.4M
EPS——-0.00-0.00-0.00
Gross Margin25.5%25.5%28.5%18.9%17.8%
Operating Margin11.8%11.8%0.6%-8.5%-10.1%
Net Margin9.6%9.6%-0.9%-1.5%-7.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.320.320.170.120.14
Current Ratio1.381.38———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.1M$-3.1M$-2.6M$2.7M$-354858.00
Returns
ROE10.2%10.2%-0.4%-0.7%-3.2%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA3.313.317.055.219.42
P/B0.560.560.540.460.50
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth156.3%156.3%6.4%-7.2%—
EPS Growth——50.0%75.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +0.0%

Total return

+0.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.00 → n/d

Residual

+0.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.