StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5OC.SI$0.08+0.00%
Fair $0.08+0.0%

5OC.SI

Koyo International Limited

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionSES

$0.08

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.08Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 62/B
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-7.0M · quality 39.7/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 4/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

62/100

B

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 5OC.SILocal privado en este navegador · Koyo International Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$14M

P/E

3.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

1.3x

↓

ROE

14.4%

↑

Gross Margin

12.0%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.42

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

5OC.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.076Periodo +16.9%
Fair value: $0.076

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+45.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

16.1%

FCF / Net income

5.79x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $118.8M · net income $3.3M · FCF $19.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

12.0%+0.6% pts

Operating margin

3.5%+19.5% pts

Net margin

2.8%+18.8% pts

FCF margin

16.1%+28.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$118.8M$118.8M$47.3M$61.0M$38.7M
Net Income$3.3M$3.3M$58000.00$1.5M$-6.2M
EBITDA$5.2M$5.2M$1.3M$2.6M$-5.2M
EPS——0.000.01-0.03
Gross Margin12.0%12.0%20.9%24.5%11.4%
Operating Margin3.5%3.5%0.5%2.7%-16.0%
Net Margin2.8%2.8%0.1%2.5%-16.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.420.420.630.600.12
Current Ratio1.231.23———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$19.1M$19.1M$-8.7M$-7.0M$-4.7M
Returns
ROE14.4%14.4%0.3%9.0%-39.7%
Valuation
P/E3.803.80140.002.84—
EV/EBITDA1.271.2713.912.43—
P/B0.630.630.410.260.63
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth151.3%151.3%-22.5%57.6%—
EPS Growth——-96.3%124.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +68.9%

Total return

+68.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.00 → n/d

Residual

+68.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+68.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.