StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
6019.SR$22.30+7.61%
Fair $22.30+0.0%

6019.SR

6019.SR

Consumer Defensive / Education & Training ServicesSaudi

$22.30

+1.57 (+7.61%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $22.30Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $87.1M · quality 67.7/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 58/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 0unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 6019.SRLocal privado en este navegador · 6019.SR
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.3B

P/E

15.8x

↑

EV/EBITDA

9.4x

↑

ROE

10.1%

↑

Gross Margin

44.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.19

↓
52-Week Range$22
$18$28

TradingView lightweight chart

6019.SR price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $22.20Periodo -3.9%
Fair value: $22.30

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2024–2025 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+22.1%

FCF CAGR

-4.3%

FCF margin

15.9%

FCF / Net income

0.65x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $533.9M · net income $130.4M · FCF $85.1M

2024-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

44.7%-1.7% pts

Operating margin

23.2%-8.3% pts

Net margin

24.4%-3.0% pts

FCF margin

15.9%-4.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
Income Statement
Revenue$533.9M$533.9M$437.1M
Net Income$130.4M$130.4M$120.1M
EBITDA$232.3M$232.3M$215.9M
EPS1.271.271.17
Gross Margin44.7%44.7%46.5%
Operating Margin23.2%23.2%31.5%
Net Margin24.4%24.4%27.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.190.190.14
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$85.1M$85.1M$89.0M
Returns
ROE10.1%10.1%10.4%
Valuation
P/E15.8215.82—
EV/EBITDA9.429.42—
P/B1.771.77—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth22.1%22.1%—
EPS Growth8.3%8.3%—
Dividend Yield3.3%3.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

15.9%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$1.98

Spread vs growth

-7.6%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

13.5%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$2.39

Spread vs growth

-5.2%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

11.7%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$3.86

Spread vs growth

-3.4%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -0.6%

Total return

-0.6%

Start / end P/E

19.7x → 17.5x

EPS bridge

1.17 → 1.27

Residual

-0.9%

EPS growth+8.3%
Multiple rerating-11.2%
Dividend+3.3%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-0.9%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.