StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
6060.SR$12.62+1.07%
Fair $12.62+0.0%

6060.SR

Ash-Sharqiyah Development Co.

Consumer Defensive / Farm ProductsSaudi

$12.62

+0.13 (+1.07%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $12.62Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 16/F
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-41.6M · quality 72.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 38/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

16/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -2.4%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 6060.SRLocal privado en este navegador · Ash-Sharqiyah Development Co.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$379M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

133.4x

↑

ROE

-2.4%

↓

Gross Margin

7.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.05

↓
52-Week Range$13
$12$18

TradingView lightweight chart

6060.SR price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $12.30Periodo -3.5%
Fair value: $12.62

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-29.3%

FCF / Net income

8.33x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $236.0M · net income $-8.3M · FCF $-69.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

7.8%— pts

Operating margin

-5.0%— pts

Net margin

-3.5%— pts

FCF margin

-29.3%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$236.0M$236.0M$85.8M——
Net Income$-8.3M$-8.3M$-4.2M$-185743.00$-3.2M
EBITDA$2.8M$2.8M$6.0M$1.3M$-1.9M
EPS——-0.14-0.01-0.16
Gross Margin7.8%7.8%3.1%——
Operating Margin-5.0%-5.0%-20.3%——
Net Margin-3.5%-3.5%-4.9%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.050.050.000.000.12
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-69.1M$-69.1M$-41.6M$-1.1M$-6.6M
Returns
ROE-2.4%-2.4%-1.2%-0.1%-2.3%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA133.42133.4283.57303.37—
P/B1.081.081.701.262.90
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth175.0%175.0%———
EPS Growth——-1637.5%95.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -25.6%

Total return

-25.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.14 → n/d

Residual

-25.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-25.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.