StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
6173.T$13.00+0.00%
Fair $13.00+0.0%

6173.T

Aqualine Ltd.

Industrials / Specialty Business ServicesTokyo

$13.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $13.00Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 18/F
F-Score: 2/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-101.5M · quality 62.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 31/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

18/100

F

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 6173.TLocal privado en este navegador · Aqualine Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$137M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

79.1%

↑

Gross Margin

45.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

-1.03

↓
52-Week Range$13
$8$410

TradingView lightweight chart

6173.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $13.00Periodo -99.1%
Fair value: $13.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-13.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-11.7%

FCF / Net income

1.17x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.46B · net income $-346.8M · FCF $-405.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

45.3%+0.5% pts

Operating margin

-11.5%-2.0% pts

Net margin

-10.0%+0.4% pts

FCF margin

-11.7%-2.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3.46B$3.46B$4.85B$4.58B$5.26B
Net Income$-346.8M$-346.8M$-371.3M$-170.5M$-549.9M
EBITDA$-369.6M$-369.6M$-348.8M$-66.6M$-322.2M
EPS——-123.69-79.78-275.40
Gross Margin45.3%45.3%40.7%44.9%44.8%
Operating Margin-11.5%-11.5%-7.2%-5.6%-9.5%
Net Margin-10.0%-10.0%-7.7%-3.7%-10.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-1.03-1.03-47.7821.4796.69
Current Ratio1.331.33———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-405.9M$-405.9M$-42.6M$-101.5M$-487.2M
Returns
ROE79.1%79.1%3938.4%-419.9%-4918.0%
Valuation
P/B———23.6883.22
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-28.5%-28.5%5.9%-13.0%—
EPS Growth——-55.0%71.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -96.0%

Total return

-96.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-123.69 → n/d

Residual

-96.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-96.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.