StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
6554.T$985.00-0.40%
Fair $985.00+0.0%

6554.T

SUS Co.,Ltd.

Industrials / ConglomeratesTokyo

$985.00

-4.00 (-0.40%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $985.00Fund rank 36/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 53/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $675.0M · quality 73.0/100

Data gap 36/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 67/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

53/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 6554.TLocal privado en este navegador · SUS Co.,Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$8.8B

P/E

8.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.0x

↓

ROE

21.7%

↑

Gross Margin

26.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$985
$985$1298

TradingView lightweight chart

6554.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $990.00Periodo -7.5%
Fair value: $985.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+12.8%

FCF CAGR

+15.6%

FCF margin

6.2%

FCF / Net income

1.01x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $15.02B · net income $915.0M · FCF $926.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

26.1%-0.3% pts

Operating margin

8.1%+1.1% pts

Net margin

6.1%+3.1% pts

FCF margin

6.2%+0.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$15.02B$15.02B$13.22B$11.50B$10.46B
Net Income$915.0M$915.0M$602.0M$461.0M$316.0M
EBITDA$1.34B$1.34B$895.0M$685.0M$677.0M
EPS——66.2650.2734.27
Gross Margin26.1%26.1%25.1%25.3%26.3%
Operating Margin8.1%8.1%6.3%5.3%7.0%
Net Margin6.1%6.1%4.6%4.0%3.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.000.000.000.01
Current Ratio2.592.59———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$926.0M$926.0M$675.0M$98.0M$600.0M
Returns
ROE21.7%21.7%16.9%14.0%10.4%
Valuation
P/E8.738.7310.7016.2723.52
EV/EBITDA4.014.014.067.156.97
P/B2.082.081.812.282.45
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth13.6%13.6%14.9%9.9%—
EPS Growth——31.8%46.7%—
Dividend Yield5.1%5.1%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +1.7%

Total return

+1.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

66.26 → n/d

Residual

-3.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+5.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-3.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.