StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
6563.T$493.00+1.02%
Fair $493.00+0.0%

6563.T

Mirai Works Inc.

Industrials / Staffing & Employment ServicesTokyo

$493.00

+5.00 (+1.02%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $493.00Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 31/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $269.9M · quality 52.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 57/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

31/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 6563.TLocal privado en este navegador · Mirai Works Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.6B

P/E

22.7x

↑

EV/EBITDA

3.1x

↓

ROE

7.0%

↑

Gross Margin

25.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$493
$453$732

TradingView lightweight chart

6563.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $493.00Periodo -70.1%
Fair value: $493.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+20.6%

FCF CAGR

+1.0%

FCF margin

1.1%

FCF / Net income

1.29x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $11.14B · net income $91.2M · FCF $117.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

25.5%+0.5% pts

Operating margin

2.5%+0.8% pts

Net margin

0.8%+0.2% pts

FCF margin

1.1%-0.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$11.14B$11.14B$10.61B$8.36B$6.35B
Net Income$91.2M$91.2M$66.5M$192.7M$39.3M
EBITDA$358.9M$358.9M$333.6M$417.7M$168.5M
EPS——12.4336.447.47
Gross Margin25.5%25.5%25.7%26.0%25.0%
Operating Margin2.5%2.5%5.4%3.5%1.8%
Net Margin0.8%0.8%0.6%2.3%0.6%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio2.012.01———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$117.7M$117.7M$720.9M$269.9M$114.1M
Returns
ROE7.0%7.0%5.1%15.9%4.2%
Valuation
P/E22.6622.6691.9522.6788.62
EV/EBITDA3.143.1413.628.3515.75
P/B1.971.974.703.603.71
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth5.1%5.1%26.9%31.6%—
EPS Growth——-65.9%387.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -27.0%

Total return

-27.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

12.43 → n/d

Residual

-27.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-27.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.