StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
6887.TW$36.00-2.57%
Fair $36.00+0.0%

6887.TW

6887.TW

Industrials / Waste ManagementTaiwan

$36.00

-0.95 (-2.57%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $36.00Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $113.5M · quality 50.0/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 25/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 6887.TWLocal privado en este navegador · 6887.TW
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.7B

P/E

7.9x

↓

EV/EBITDA

2.3x

↓

ROE

11.3%

↑

Gross Margin

22.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.17

↓
52-Week Range$36
$31$88

TradingView lightweight chart

6887.TW price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $36.00Periodo -59.4%
Fair value: $36.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+10.0%

FCF CAGR

-48.7%

FCF margin

2.4%

FCF / Net income

0.34x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $4.79B · net income $332.5M · FCF $113.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

22.9%+3.8% pts

Operating margin

8.8%+1.2% pts

Net margin

6.9%+0.9% pts

FCF margin

2.4%-20.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$4.79B$4.79B$5.44B$4.46B$3.60B
Net Income$332.5M$332.5M$489.6M$457.4M$219.2M
EBITDA$569.5M$569.5M$777.2M$700.1M$355.4M
EPS——7.427.023.54
Gross Margin22.9%22.9%21.4%25.0%19.1%
Operating Margin8.8%8.8%8.9%13.0%7.6%
Net Margin6.9%6.9%9.0%10.2%6.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.170.170.250.150.12
Current Ratio1.911.91———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$113.5M$113.5M$-263.6M$364.7M$838.6M
Returns
ROE11.3%11.3%22.1%23.4%13.1%
Valuation
P/E7.957.95———
EV/EBITDA2.332.33———
P/B0.910.91———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-12.0%-12.0%22.0%24.1%—
EPS Growth——5.7%98.3%—
Dividend Yield10.7%10.7%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -48.4%

Total return

-48.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

7.42 → n/d

Residual

-59.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+10.7%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-59.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.