StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
6902.TW$147.00+2.80%
Fair $147.00+0.0%

6902.TW

Gogolook Co., Ltd.

Technology / Software - ApplicationTaiwan

$147.00

+4.00 (+2.80%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $147.00Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 55/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-158.8M · quality 58.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 30/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

55/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 6902.TWLocal privado en este navegador · Gogolook Co., Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$5.2B

P/E

93.6x

↑

EV/EBITDA

59.1x

↑

ROE

7.7%

↑

Gross Margin

88.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.47

↑
52-Week Range$147
$66$149

TradingView lightweight chart

6902.TW price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $147.00Periodo -44.9%
Fair value: $147.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+35.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-15.2%

FCF / Net income

-2.95x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.05B · net income $53.8M · FCF $-158.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

88.3%+2.9% pts

Operating margin

8.2%+25.3% pts

Net margin

5.1%+18.8% pts

FCF margin

-15.2%-2.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.05B$1.05B$866.9M$774.3M$420.1M
Net Income$53.8M$53.8M$-39.7M$5.1M$-57.4M
EBITDA$88.3M$88.3M$-11.7M$18.1M$-46.4M
EPS——-1.240.16-1.90
Gross Margin88.3%88.3%90.6%91.4%85.5%
Operating Margin8.2%8.2%-4.6%2.2%-17.2%
Net Margin5.1%5.1%-4.6%0.7%-13.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.470.470.620.040.13
Current Ratio2.182.18———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-158.8M$-158.8M$-254.2M$29.7M$-51.8M
Returns
ROE7.7%7.7%-9.7%1.1%-24.4%
Valuation
P/E93.6393.63—1062.50—
EV/EBITDA59.1259.12—271.78—
P/B7.437.439.2911.84—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth20.9%20.9%11.9%84.3%—
EPS Growth——-875.0%108.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +74.4%

Total return

+74.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.24 → n/d

Residual

+74.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+74.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.