StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
6962.TW$38.15+0.13%
Fair $38.15+0.0%

6962.TW

6962.TW

Technology / Electronic ComponentsTaiwan

$38.15

+0.05 (+0.13%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $38.15Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 51/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $1.9B · quality 63.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 44/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

51/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 6962.TWLocal privado en este navegador · 6962.TW
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$18.8B

P/E

13.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.3x

↓

ROE

6.8%

↑

Gross Margin

27.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$38
$29$59

TradingView lightweight chart

6962.TW price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $38.15Periodo -34.0%
Fair value: $38.15

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-4.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-0.1%

FCF / Net income

-0.02x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $19.09B · net income $1.36B · FCF $-26.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

27.1%-0.7% pts

Operating margin

9.0%-2.1% pts

Net margin

7.1%-9.0% pts

FCF margin

-0.1%-5.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$19.09B$19.09B$22.46B$22.40B$22.19B
Net Income$1.36B$1.36B$2.25B$1.10B$3.57B
EBITDA$2.38B$2.38B$3.71B$1.99B$4.19B
EPS——5.513.3010.92
Gross Margin27.1%27.1%26.8%20.3%27.8%
Operating Margin9.0%9.0%9.8%5.5%11.0%
Net Margin7.1%7.1%10.0%4.9%16.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.020.000.060.08
Current Ratio2.632.63———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-26.4M$-26.4M$3.00B$1.88B$1.08B
Returns
ROE6.8%6.8%11.5%7.1%27.9%
Valuation
P/E13.3413.349.35——
EV/EBITDA7.257.253.78——
P/B0.940.941.07——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-15.0%-15.0%0.3%0.9%—
EPS Growth——67.0%-69.8%—
Dividend Yield5.3%5.3%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -25.5%

Total return

-25.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

5.51 → n/d

Residual

-30.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+5.2%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-30.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.