StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
6999.TWO$31.00+0.00%
Fair $31.00+0.0%

6999.TWO

6999.TWO

Healthcare / BiotechnologyTaipei Exchange

$31.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $31.00Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 37/D
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $30.4M · quality 60.3/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 49/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

37/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 6999.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · 6999.TWO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$682M

P/E

30.4x

↑

EV/EBITDA

16.0x

↑

ROE

8.7%

↑

Gross Margin

78.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.07

↓
52-Week Range$31
$28$49

TradingView lightweight chart

6999.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $31.65Periodo -11.6%
Fair value: $31.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+10.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-11.1%

FCF / Net income

-0.62x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $126.2M · net income $22.6M · FCF $-14.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

78.1%+13.7% pts

Operating margin

19.5%-5.8% pts

Net margin

17.9%-2.1% pts

FCF margin

-11.1%-35.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$126.2M$126.2M$115.3M$96.8M$94.0M
Net Income$22.6M$22.6M$24.3M$21.5M$18.7M
EBITDA$38.0M$38.0M$42.1M$39.9M$40.6M
EPS——1.201.030.90
Gross Margin78.1%78.1%73.8%72.8%64.5%
Operating Margin19.5%19.5%24.0%26.3%25.3%
Net Margin17.9%17.9%21.1%22.2%19.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.070.070.010.030.05
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-14.0M$-14.0M$30.4M$30.8M$23.0M
Returns
ROE8.7%8.7%9.7%10.4%10.1%
Valuation
P/E30.3930.3925.07——
EV/EBITDA16.0516.0512.60——
P/B2.622.622.61——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth9.5%9.5%19.1%3.0%—
EPS Growth——17.0%14.4%—
Dividend Yield1.9%1.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -9.0%

Total return

-9.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.20 → n/d

Residual

-10.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+1.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-10.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.