StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7031.KL$0.35+2.90%
Fair $0.35+0.0%

7031.KL

Amtel Holdings Berhad

Technology / Scientific & Technical InstrumentsKuala Lumpur

$0.35

+0.01 (+2.90%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.35Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 50/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $4.4M · quality 50.7/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 26/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

50/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 7031.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Amtel Holdings Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$34M

P/E

7.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

2.1x

↓

ROE

6.3%

↑

Gross Margin

23.7%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

7031.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.355Periodo -83.4%
Fair value: $0.355

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

6.3%

FCF / Net income

0.85x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $69.9M · net income $5.2M · FCF $4.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

23.7%+5.2% pts

Operating margin

10.1%+4.5% pts

Net margin

7.4%+4.0% pts

FCF margin

6.3%+13.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$69.9M$69.9M$71.7M$71.7M$60.5M
Net Income$5.2M$5.2M$5.4M$5.6M$2.1M
EBITDA$8.5M$8.5M$9.1M$8.6M$5.0M
EPS——0.060.060.02
Gross Margin23.7%23.7%22.8%21.4%18.5%
Operating Margin10.1%10.1%10.6%9.8%5.7%
Net Margin7.4%7.4%7.5%7.8%3.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.010.020.01
Current Ratio4.344.34———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$4.4M$4.4M$2.4M$11.6M$-4.4M
Returns
ROE6.3%6.3%7.0%7.8%3.2%
Valuation
P/E7.107.109.4110.9040.24
EV/EBITDA2.092.093.924.7415.16
P/B0.410.410.660.851.27
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-2.6%-2.6%0.1%18.5%—
EPS Growth——-1.1%171.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -13.4%

Total return

-13.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.06 → n/d

Residual

-13.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-13.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.