StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7121.KL$0.71+0.00%
Fair $0.71+0.0%

7121.KL

XL Holdings Berhad

Consumer Defensive / Farm ProductsKuala Lumpur

$0.71

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.71Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-19.5M · quality 46.0/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 3/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. ROE is 4.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 7121.KLLocal privado en este navegador · XL Holdings Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$353M

P/E

35.5x

↑

EV/EBITDA

17.7x

↑

ROE

4.8%

↓

Gross Margin

24.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

7121.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.710Periodo -73.7%
Fair value: $0.710

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+9.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

6.7%

FCF / Net income

0.74x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $109.1M · net income $9.8M · FCF $7.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

24.1%+14.4% pts

Operating margin

11.3%+10.1% pts

Net margin

9.0%+8.9% pts

FCF margin

6.7%+29.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$109.1M$109.1M$70.5M$84.2M
Net Income$9.8M$9.8M$7.3M$116044.00
EBITDA$16.4M$16.4M$13.3M$2.9M
EPS——0.020.00
Gross Margin24.1%24.1%33.0%9.7%
Operating Margin11.3%11.3%12.5%1.1%
Net Margin9.0%9.0%10.4%0.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.020.030.10
Current Ratio19.2519.25——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$7.3M$7.3M$-19.7M$-19.5M
Returns
ROE4.8%4.8%4.0%0.1%
Valuation
P/E35.5035.5028.031440.57
EV/EBITDA17.7117.7115.1159.16
P/B1.531.531.132.14
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth54.7%54.7%-16.3%—
EPS Growth——5110.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +31.5%

Total return

+31.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.02 → n/d

Residual

+31.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+31.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.