StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7128.KL$0.28+0.00%
Fair $0.28+0.0%

7128.KL

CAM Resources Berhad

Consumer Defensive / Farm ProductsKuala Lumpur

$0.28

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.28Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 52/C
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $1.0M · quality 50.0/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 23/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

52/100

C

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 7128.KLLocal privado en este navegador · CAM Resources Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$51M

P/E

3.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

1.3x

↓

ROE

8.3%

↑

Gross Margin

5.5%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.10

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

7128.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.280Periodo -15.6%
Fair value: $0.280

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-1.5%

FCF CAGR

+12.6%

FCF margin

3.7%

FCF / Net income

1.29x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $473.6M · net income $13.7M · FCF $17.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

5.5%-0.8% pts

Operating margin

3.9%-0.7% pts

Net margin

2.9%-0.4% pts

FCF margin

3.7%+1.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$473.6M$473.6M$408.1M$336.0M$496.0M
Net Income$13.7M$13.7M$2.5M$13.8M$16.2M
EBITDA$28.3M$28.3M$14.0M$27.1M$31.3M
EPS——0.010.070.08
Gross Margin5.5%5.5%2.9%5.2%6.3%
Operating Margin3.9%3.9%1.1%5.5%4.6%
Net Margin2.9%2.9%0.6%4.1%3.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.100.100.120.170.22
Current Ratio2.042.04———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$17.7M$17.7M$1.0M$-12.5M$12.4M
Returns
ROE8.3%8.3%1.7%9.2%11.6%
Valuation
P/E3.503.5024.095.804.30
EV/EBITDA1.271.274.543.062.15
P/B0.310.310.400.540.50
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth16.0%16.0%21.5%-32.3%—
EPS Growth——-81.5%-12.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +1.8%

Total return

+1.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.01 → n/d

Residual

+1.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+1.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.