StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7241.KL$0.78+1.97%
Fair $0.78+0.0%

7241.KL

Nextgreen Global Berhad

Industrials / ConglomeratesKuala Lumpur

$0.78

+0.01 (+1.97%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.78Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 38/D
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-71.9M · quality 69.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 31/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

38/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 7241.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Nextgreen Global Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$847M

P/E

25.8x

↑

EV/EBITDA

16.1x

↑

ROE

6.2%

↑

Gross Margin

70.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.35

↑
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

7241.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.775Periodo +830.5%
Fair value: $0.775

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+40.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-126.5%

FCF / Net income

-3.75x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $91.0M · net income $30.7M · FCF $-115.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

70.2%+34.9% pts

Operating margin

60.2%-5.7% pts

Net margin

33.7%-4.8% pts

FCF margin

-126.5%+25.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$91.0M$91.0M$68.0M$36.3M$32.9M
Net Income$30.7M$30.7M$23.1M$9.4M$12.7M
EBITDA$62.2M$62.2M$36.5M$25.6M$23.0M
EPS——0.020.010.01
Gross Margin70.2%70.2%53.9%36.2%35.3%
Operating Margin60.2%60.2%46.5%46.7%65.9%
Net Margin33.7%33.7%33.9%25.8%38.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.350.350.160.210.26
Current Ratio4.194.19———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-115.1M$-115.1M$-71.9M$-52.9M$-50.0M
Returns
ROE6.2%6.2%5.2%2.8%4.6%
Valuation
P/E25.8325.8339.0499.0152.80
EV/EBITDA16.0516.0526.3838.8032.06
P/B1.711.712.042.752.44
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth33.8%33.8%87.1%10.4%—
EPS Growth——125.7%-29.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -3.1%

Total return

-3.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.02 → n/d

Residual

-3.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-3.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.