StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7323.KL$0.47+0.00%
Fair $0.47+0.0%

7323.KL

Ken Holdings Berhad

Industrials / Engineering & ConstructionKuala Lumpur

$0.47

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.47Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 35/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $12.6M · quality 64.7/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 83/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

35/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. ROE is 2.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 7323.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Ken Holdings Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$85M

P/E

11.9x

↓

EV/EBITDA

-3.9x

↓

ROE

2.1%

↓

Gross Margin

50.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

7323.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.475Periodo -26.4%
Fair value: $0.475

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.2%

FCF CAGR

-2.8%

FCF margin

53.3%

FCF / Net income

1.62x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $23.6M · net income $7.8M · FCF $12.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

50.5%+6.8% pts

Operating margin

-4.9%-24.0% pts

Net margin

33.0%+19.0% pts

FCF margin

53.3%-12.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$23.6M$23.6M$23.2M$37.3M$20.8M
Net Income$7.8M$7.8M$8.2M$11.1M$2.9M
EBITDA$2.0M$2.0M$3.5M$17.9M$8.1M
EPS——0.050.060.02
Gross Margin50.5%50.5%57.4%42.9%43.7%
Operating Margin-4.9%-4.9%1.8%38.2%19.1%
Net Margin33.0%33.0%35.4%29.7%14.0%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio5.655.65———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$12.6M$12.6M$6.6M$20.5M$13.7M
Returns
ROE2.1%2.1%2.2%3.1%0.8%
Valuation
P/E11.8811.8810.2010.1729.25
EV/EBITDA-3.94-3.94-4.150.754.05
P/B0.230.230.250.310.30
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth1.6%1.6%-37.7%79.0%—
EPS Growth——-16.7%200.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -6.9%

Total return

-6.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.05 → n/d

Residual

-6.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-6.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.