StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7439.KL$1.82+0.00%
Fair $1.82+0.0%

7439.KL

Teck Guan Perdana Berhad

Consumer Defensive / Packaged FoodsKuala Lumpur

$1.82

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.82Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $9.4M · quality 57.3/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 7439.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Teck Guan Perdana Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$73M

P/E

4.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

0.7x

↓

ROE

11.9%

↑

Gross Margin

9.5%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.10

↓
52-Week Range$2
$2$2

TradingView lightweight chart

7439.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.820Periodo -3.7%
Fair value: $1.820

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+1.9%

FCF CAGR

-28.5%

FCF margin

4.3%

FCF / Net income

1.26x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $518.6M · net income $17.7M · FCF $22.3M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

9.5%-5.3% pts

Operating margin

4.7%-4.7% pts

Net margin

3.4%-2.7% pts

FCF margin

4.3%-8.2% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$518.6M$518.6M$361.8M$294.2M$489.7M
Net Income$17.7M$17.7M$21.2M$7.7M$29.8M
EBITDA$31.1M$31.1M$31.6M$17.4M$47.9M
EPS——0.530.190.74
Gross Margin9.5%9.5%11.9%10.6%14.8%
Operating Margin4.7%4.7%7.1%3.5%9.4%
Net Margin3.4%3.4%5.9%2.6%6.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.100.100.150.180.25
Current Ratio2.672.67———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$22.3M$22.3M$-4.1M$9.4M$61.1M
Returns
ROE11.9%11.9%16.0%6.8%27.8%
Valuation
P/E4.144.143.128.552.51
EV/EBITDA0.720.721.131.710.97
P/B0.490.490.500.580.70
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth43.3%43.3%23.0%-39.9%—
EPS Growth——175.5%-74.2%—
Dividend Yield3.9%3.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +10.9%

Total return

+10.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.53 → n/d

Residual

+7.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+7.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.