StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7558.TWO$24.70+10.71%
Fair $24.70+0.0%

7558.TWO

Bryton Inc.

Technology / Scientific & Technical InstrumentsTaipei Exchange

$24.70

+2.40 (+10.71%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $24.70Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 64/B
F-Score: 7/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 20%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $11.6M · quality 55.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 27/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

64/100

B

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 7558.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · Bryton Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$460M

P/E

15.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.2x

↓

ROE

13.7%

↑

Gross Margin

40.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.04

↓
52-Week Range$25
$10$30

TradingView lightweight chart

7558.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $24.80Periodo -72.4%
Fair value: $24.70

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+12.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

17.2%

FCF / Net income

2.23x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $388.2M · net income $29.9M · FCF $66.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

40.6%+1.8% pts

Operating margin

8.2%+18.4% pts

Net margin

7.7%+13.4% pts

FCF margin

17.2%+35.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$388.2M$388.2M$290.3M$133.5M$269.9M
Net Income$29.9M$29.9M$6.6M$-79.3M$-15.4M
EBITDA$42.3M$42.3M$13.5M$-60.7M$9.4M
EPS——0.36-4.26-0.83
Gross Margin40.6%40.6%34.5%30.9%38.8%
Operating Margin8.2%8.2%-1.7%-64.2%-10.1%
Net Margin7.7%7.7%2.3%-59.4%-5.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.040.040.040.030.17
Current Ratio4.504.50———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$66.6M$66.6M$1.0M$11.6M$-49.2M
Returns
ROE13.7%13.7%3.5%-43.8%-5.9%
Valuation
P/E15.6315.6328.06——
EV/EBITDA7.227.226.91—18.27
P/B2.112.111.001.321.00
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth33.7%33.7%117.4%-50.5%—
EPS Growth——108.5%-413.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +138.5%

Total return

+138.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.36 → n/d

Residual

+138.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+138.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.