StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7610.T$129.00-0.76%
Fair $129.00+0.0%

7610.T

Tay Two Co., Ltd.

Consumer Cyclical / Specialty RetailTokyo

$129.00

-1.00 (-0.76%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $129.00Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 41/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $421.4M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 18/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

41/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 7610.TLocal privado en este navegador · Tay Two Co., Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$8.2B

P/E

9.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.4x

↓

ROE

8.2%

↑

Gross Margin

33.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.61

↑
52-Week Range$129
$129$164

TradingView lightweight chart

7610.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $131.00Periodo +439.1%
Fair value: $129.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+10.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

1.2%

FCF / Net income

0.84x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $36.48B · net income $501.6M · FCF $421.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

33.8%+0.1% pts

Operating margin

2.5%-2.4% pts

Net margin

1.4%-4.2% pts

FCF margin

1.2%+1.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$36.48B$36.48B$35.20B$31.26B$26.85B
Net Income$501.6M$501.6M$568.5M$1.00B$1.50B
EBITDA$1.21B$1.21B$1.51B$1.87B$1.45B
EPS——8.8415.5422.29
Gross Margin33.8%33.8%33.7%34.4%33.7%
Operating Margin2.5%2.5%3.8%5.0%4.9%
Net Margin1.4%1.4%1.6%3.2%5.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.610.610.600.410.38
Current Ratio1.711.71———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$421.4M$421.4M$-343.9M$645.3M$-45.8M
Returns
ROE8.2%8.2%9.8%17.9%30.7%
Valuation
P/E9.459.4513.6912.483.45
EV/EBITDA7.447.445.576.583.65
P/B1.331.331.342.231.06
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth3.6%3.6%12.6%16.4%—
EPS Growth——-43.1%-30.3%—
Dividend Yield3.0%3.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -4.0%

Total return

-4.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

8.84 → n/d

Residual

-7.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-7.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.