StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7678.T$6540.00-3.40%
Fair $6540.00+0.0%

7678.T

Asakuma Co.,Ltd

Consumer Cyclical / RestaurantsTokyo

$6540.00

-230.00 (-3.40%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $6540.00Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 52/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $157.5M · quality 46.0/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 52/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

52/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 7678.TLocal privado en este navegador · Asakuma Co.,Ltd
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$34.8B

P/E

106.4x

↑

EV/EBITDA

50.8x

↑

ROE

9.6%

↑

Gross Margin

56.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$6540
$4165$7050

TradingView lightweight chart

7678.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $6,540Periodo +301.2%
Fair value: $6,540

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2026 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+17.6%

FCF CAGR

+0.6%

FCF margin

5.3%

FCF / Net income

1.64x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $10.05B · net income $325.1M · FCF $532.3M

2022-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

56.1%-2.3% pts

Operating margin

5.2%+11.7% pts

Net margin

3.2%+2.1% pts

FCF margin

5.3%-4.6% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$10.05B$10.05B$8.35B$6.20B$5.25B
Net Income$325.1M$325.1M$568.0M$-12.2M$60.1M
EBITDA$636.1M$636.1M$291.1M$88.9M$348.9M
EPS——106.86-2.2911.27
Gross Margin56.1%56.1%55.4%59.3%58.4%
Operating Margin5.2%5.2%2.2%1.2%-6.5%
Net Margin3.2%3.2%6.8%-0.2%1.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity——0.030.040.21
Current Ratio2.382.38———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$532.3M$532.3M$34.6M$157.5M$518.8M
Returns
ROE9.6%9.6%18.5%-0.5%2.5%
Valuation
P/E106.38106.3837.99—135.58
EV/EBITDA50.8050.8067.3276.5819.09
P/B10.2410.247.033.553.38
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth20.3%20.3%34.6%18.2%—
EPS Growth——4766.4%-120.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +56.3%

Total return

+56.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

106.86 → n/d

Residual

+56.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+56.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.