StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7714.TWO$125.50+6.81%
Fair $125.50+0.0%

7714.TWO

7714.TWO

Technology / Information Technology ServicesTaipei Exchange

$125.50

+8.00 (+6.81%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $125.50Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $98.7M · quality 66.7/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 59/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 7714.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · 7714.TWO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.6B

P/E

20.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

13.3x

↑

ROE

23.8%

↑

Gross Margin

19.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$126
$92$190

TradingView lightweight chart

7714.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $125.50Periodo -9.8%
Fair value: $125.50

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+18.9%

FCF CAGR

+80.0%

FCF margin

5.5%

FCF / Net income

0.75x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.80B · net income $132.3M · FCF $98.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

19.1%+1.2% pts

Operating margin

9.0%+0.5% pts

Net margin

7.3%+1.6% pts

FCF margin

5.5%+3.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.80B$1.80B$1.24B$1.13B$1.07B
Net Income$132.3M$132.3M$94.5M$92.1M$62.0M
EBITDA$178.6M$178.6M$130.0M$126.2M$87.9M
EPS——5.025.063.76
Gross Margin19.1%19.1%22.1%21.0%17.8%
Operating Margin9.0%9.0%9.7%10.1%8.5%
Net Margin7.3%7.3%7.6%8.1%5.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.020.160.160.69
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$98.7M$98.7M$112.4M$41.5M$16.9M
Returns
ROE23.8%23.8%30.9%36.4%34.9%
Valuation
P/E20.0220.0218.9822.94—
EV/EBITDA13.3213.3213.2316.66—
P/B4.754.755.888.35—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth45.1%45.1%9.9%5.4%—
EPS Growth——-0.8%34.7%—
Dividend Yield4.0%4.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +9.0%

Total return

+9.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

5.02 → n/d

Residual

+5.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+4.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+5.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.