StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7715.TWO$28.20+0.89%
Fair $28.20+0.0%

7715.TWO

7715.TWO

Industrials / Waste ManagementTaipei Exchange

$28.20

+0.25 (+0.89%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $28.20Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 43/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $94.1M · quality 47.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 25/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

43/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 7715.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · 7715.TWO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$923M

P/E

9.2x

↓

EV/EBITDA

4.4x

↓

ROE

10.9%

↑

Gross Margin

21.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.32

↓
52-Week Range$28
$28$45

TradingView lightweight chart

7715.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $28.20Periodo -41.6%
Fair value: $28.20

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+8.0%

FCF CAGR

+14.3%

FCF margin

7.6%

FCF / Net income

0.92x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.24B · net income $101.9M · FCF $94.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

21.3%-6.7% pts

Operating margin

9.4%-9.3% pts

Net margin

8.2%-4.5% pts

FCF margin

7.6%+1.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.24B$1.24B$1.72B$1.46B$983.3M
Net Income$101.9M$101.9M$147.2M$95.5M$125.4M
EBITDA$226.5M$226.5M$286.0M$198.5M$229.0M
EPS——4.963.314.69
Gross Margin21.3%21.3%21.2%17.4%28.0%
Operating Margin9.4%9.4%11.6%9.2%18.7%
Net Margin8.2%8.2%8.6%6.5%12.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.320.320.821.010.34
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$94.1M$94.1M$169.8M$-288.3M$63.0M
Returns
ROE10.9%10.9%18.5%13.9%24.3%
Valuation
P/E9.259.2510.4414.58—
EV/EBITDA4.384.386.489.37—
P/B0.990.991.942.03—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-27.8%-27.8%17.3%48.7%—
EPS Growth——49.8%-29.4%—
Dividend Yield6.4%6.4%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -30.5%

Total return

-30.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

4.96 → n/d

Residual

-37.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+6.4%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-37.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.