StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7718.TWO$49.70+1.43%
Fair $49.70+0.0%

7718.TWO

7718.TWO

Industrials / Tools & AccessoriesTaipei Exchange

$49.70

+0.70 (+1.43%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $49.70Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 54/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $104.1M · quality 51.3/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 29/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

54/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 7718.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · 7718.TWO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.3B

P/E

13.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

8.4x

↓

ROE

10.9%

↑

Gross Margin

17.5%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.17

↓
52-Week Range$50
$42$56

TradingView lightweight chart

7718.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $49.70Periodo -5.2%
Fair value: $49.70

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-4.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-5.4%

FCF / Net income

-0.78x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $2.44B · net income $168.9M · FCF $-130.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

17.5%-0.3% pts

Operating margin

7.9%-0.8% pts

Net margin

6.9%-2.7% pts

FCF margin

-5.4%-18.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$2.44B$2.44B$2.41B$2.28B$2.84B
Net Income$168.9M$168.9M$248.5M$209.1M$273.5M
EBITDA$243.7M$243.7M$336.2M$305.1M$373.6M
EPS——6.065.677.42
Gross Margin17.5%17.5%20.1%20.1%17.7%
Operating Margin7.9%7.9%9.7%10.3%8.7%
Net Margin6.9%6.9%10.3%9.2%9.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.170.170.270.451.12
Current Ratio3.343.34———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-130.9M$-130.9M$104.1M$221.2M$365.1M
Returns
ROE10.9%10.9%18.9%17.6%29.5%
Valuation
P/E13.2913.298.88——
EV/EBITDA8.408.406.14——
P/B1.461.461.68——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth1.4%1.4%5.4%-19.6%—
EPS Growth——6.9%-23.6%—
Dividend Yield5.0%5.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +5.4%

Total return

+5.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

6.06 → n/d

Residual

+0.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+5.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.