StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7724.TWO$21.85-4.38%
Fair $21.85+0.0%

7724.TWO

7724.TWO

Technology / Software - ApplicationTaipei Exchange

$21.85

-1.00 (-4.38%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $21.85Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 34/D
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $1.0M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 7/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

34/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 1.4%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 7724.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · 7724.TWO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$772M

P/E

109.3x

↑

EV/EBITDA

17.7x

↑

ROE

1.4%

↓

Gross Margin

30.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.19

↓
52-Week Range$22
$13$32

TradingView lightweight chart

7724.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $21.85Periodo -41.3%
Fair value: $21.85

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-0.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-1.5%

FCF / Net income

-0.90x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $426.3M · net income $7.0M · FCF $-6.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

30.1%+2.5% pts

Operating margin

2.2%-1.8% pts

Net margin

1.7%+1.6% pts

FCF margin

-1.5%+1.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$426.3M$426.3M$415.1M$428.4M$434.9M
Net Income$7.0M$7.0M$-6.5M$1.0M$343000.00
EBITDA$40.9M$40.9M$24.3M$32.4M$33.9M
EPS——-0.180.030.01
Gross Margin30.1%30.1%21.7%26.4%27.6%
Operating Margin2.2%2.2%-3.9%-0.8%4.0%
Net Margin1.7%1.7%-1.6%0.2%0.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.190.190.160.170.27
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.3M$-6.3M$16.5M$1.0M$-13.9M
Returns
ROE1.4%1.4%-1.3%0.2%0.1%
Valuation
P/E109.25109.25———
EV/EBITDA17.7317.7351.50——
P/B1.511.512.66——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth2.7%2.7%-3.1%-1.5%—
EPS Growth——-700.0%200.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +72.0%

Total return

+72.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.18 → n/d

Residual

+72.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+72.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.