StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7749.TW$499.00+0.71%
Fair $499.00+0.0%

7749.TW

7749.TW

Technology / Software - InfrastructureTaiwan

$499.00

+3.50 (+0.71%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $499.00Fund rank 39/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 57/C
F-Score: 4/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $377.5M · quality 85.3/100

Data gap 39/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 87/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

57/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 7749.TWLocal privado en este navegador · 7749.TW
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$23.2B

P/E

44.8x

↑

EV/EBITDA

31.1x

↑

ROE

13.8%

↑

Gross Margin

76.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$499
$348$716

TradingView lightweight chart

7749.TW price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $499.00Periodo -21.4%
Fair value: $499.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+50.5%

FCF CAGR

+56.2%

FCF margin

39.4%

FCF / Net income

1.21x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.59B · net income $517.5M · FCF $626.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

76.1%-17.9% pts

Operating margin

36.2%+16.5% pts

Net margin

32.5%-7.4% pts

FCF margin

39.4%+4.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.59B$1.59B$858.7M$600.4M$466.6M
Net Income$517.5M$517.5M$265.6M$94.0M$186.5M
EBITDA$688.8M$688.8M$349.9M$143.0M$222.2M
EPS——6.852.814.42
Gross Margin76.1%76.1%86.0%95.0%94.1%
Operating Margin36.2%36.2%26.8%26.9%19.8%
Net Margin32.5%32.5%30.9%15.7%40.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.020.013.65
Current Ratio8.978.97———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$626.3M$626.3M$377.5M$195.6M$164.2M
Returns
ROE13.8%13.8%21.4%8.2%93.7%
Valuation
P/E44.8344.83———
EV/EBITDA31.0731.07———
P/B6.206.20———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth85.2%85.2%43.0%28.7%—
EPS Growth——143.8%-36.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -21.4%

Total return

-21.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

6.85 → n/d

Residual

-21.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-21.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.