StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7779.TWO$12.60+0.00%
Fair $12.60+0.0%

7779.TWO

7779.TWO

Communication Services / BroadcastingTaipei Exchange

$12.60

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $12.60Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 12/F
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-33.5M · quality 39.7/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 11/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

12/100

F

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -35.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 7779.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · 7779.TWO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$203M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-35.6%

↓

Gross Margin

15.5%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.48

↑
52-Week Range$13
$12$31

TradingView lightweight chart

7779.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $12.60Periodo -78.0%
Fair value: $12.60

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+3.5%

FCF CAGR

-12.4%

FCF margin

3.1%

FCF / Net income

-0.24x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $218.3M · net income $-28.3M · FCF $6.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

15.5%+1.1% pts

Operating margin

-11.9%-13.9% pts

Net margin

-13.0%— pts

FCF margin

3.1%-2.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$218.3M$218.3M$208.9M$210.0M$197.0M
Net Income$-28.3M$-28.3M$-99.3M$7.8M—
EBITDA$-13.6M$-13.6M$-86.2M$4.8M$12.1M
EPS——-6.230.6816.20
Gross Margin15.5%15.5%-25.5%12.5%14.4%
Operating Margin-11.9%-11.9%-48.1%-0.2%1.9%
Net Margin-13.0%-13.0%-47.5%3.7%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.480.480.290.070.09
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$6.7M$6.7M$-52.5M$-33.5M$10.0M
Returns
ROE-35.6%-35.6%-104.9%7.6%—
Valuation
P/B2.552.557.66——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth4.5%4.5%-0.5%6.6%—
EPS Growth——-1016.2%-95.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -57.8%

Total return

-57.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-6.23 → n/d

Residual

-57.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-57.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.